bingoslotsonline| Pour some glue on the pizza! Google's just-launched AI search review triggers Internet complaints

FAP, May 25 (Editor Shi Zhengcheng)-Google, the technology giant recognized as at the forefront of the battle against Microsoft / OpenAI alliance, is once again at the forefront of public opinion because of its new AI features.

At last week's annual AI O developer conference, Google made a high-profile announcement that it would officially introduce AI into its core search business, launching a feature called AI Overview (AI Overviews), which will first be launched in the US market. In short, when users search, the first thing that appears in front of them is no longer a web link, but a summary compiled by AI.

However, the feature turned over as soon as it was launched-in addition to the common "hallucinations" of AI robots, a more serious problem is that Google's AI frequently popularizes "Tieba" and satirizing jokes on news sites as serious knowledge to customers.

Put some glue on the pizza!

As the most widespread case on the Internet these days, Google's AI Review suggested that 1/8 cups of non-toxic glue should be added to the stuffing in response to "cheese can't stick to pizza". According to research by netizens, the origin of this sentence is a rather playful reply from a netizen on the Reddit of "American Post Bar" 11 years ago.

To give another example, when netizens asked "how many stones should be eaten every day", Google AI replied solemnlyBingoslotsonlineAccording to geologists, you should eat at least one small stone every day. "

The expression of this passage comes from the Onion, a website whose main business is to make up a series of exaggerated and satirical articles to attract attention, based on real background settings, and many events are completely fictional. So senior netizens know that the story must not be credible as soon as they hear the Onion News, but Google's AI is completely incapable of distinguishing.

What makes American netizens "break the defense" is that Google's AI can even get the president's information wrong. For example, some netizens said that when asked "how many Muslim presidents are there in the United States", Google will reply "1, Barack Obama". Worryingly, this answer is not only not true, but is likely to come from conspiracy theories spread by some far-right groups on the Internet.

In addition, Google's AI also suggested to netizens that "you can stare at the sun for 5-15 minutes, and darker people can stare for up to 30 minutes," and readily admitted that "Google violated the US antitrust law", declared that "Batman is a policeman" and a series of absurd responses such as "a dog has appeared in NBA, NFL and NHL competitions."

Although it is not uncommon for AI chatbots to give wrong responses, the default quality of answers returned by search engines commonly used by hundreds of millions of people is so outrageous that it quickly sparked public opinion on the Internet.

Google does not seem ready to "withdraw"

Google spokesman Meghann Farnsworth said in a statement that the errors mentioned on the Internet came from "very rare queries of that kind" and did not represent the experience of most people, according to technology media The Verge. The company has taken action to crack down on policy violations and is taking advantage of these "exceptions" to continue to improve its products.

Google further said that AI Overview provides high-quality information in the vast majority of cases, with detailed web links. The company also said that some cases on the Internet can not be repeated, there may be deliberate tampering.

The US community questioned the accuracy of Google AI in part because of "lessons learned"-Google launched the Gemini "Wen Sheng Chart" tool in February, but it was soon discovered that there was a serious problem of "fabricating history". After the outbreak of public opinion, Google immediately announced a moratorium on the generation of character images. Hassabis, the head of Google AI, said in February that the feature would be relaunched in a few weeks.

In addition to a series of mistakes, Google's AI Review has also been accused of other problems and risks.

For example, AI always excerpts content from different websites and modifies it slightly, which is also criticized as "large-scale plagiarism".

Another problem is that because Google's AI is essentially "searching and writing its own content", the company may be held legally responsible for the false content generated by AI. Previously, according to "Section 230", Google, as a search platform, does not need to be responsible for the pages searched.

Tags:

Prev: madamedestinypragmatic| Where is the Magotan atmosphere light switch?
Next: lucky777casino| What are the causes and solutions for dripping water in the exhaust pipe of Baowo BX5?